Looking at the current state of our country, the recession we are in,
the debt we are collectively facing, the status of our economy, our
unemployment rate, our environment, our failing government, and the way all of
these factors act upon one another, we have to wonder if all of these factors
are being caused by the drastic separation of the Democratic and Republican
parties. The current state of the
economy and the separation of the social classes may be caused by our political
structure, but the failing bipartisan system is largely responsible for the
inefficiency of Congress and the political animosity between citizens.
Theoretically, bipartisanship should consist of two opposing political
parties who are meant to compromise. However, each party has their own plan,
and it may be difficult to meet in the middle because of incompatible
principles and beliefs. This stalemate is known as political gridlock, or
deadlock. This refers to the state of dormancy in legislature, which is
generally due to the House of Representatives and the Senate being controlled
by opposing parties. This stems from the polarizing ideologies and the
discrepancy in political views. Because of this polarization, the more
nonpartisan voices can be silenced. The Democratic and Republican parties hold
the most dominance in U.S. politics. Although we have third parties such as the
Green Party, the Constitution Party, and the Libertarian Party, they hold
little political authority or power comparatively to the Democrats and Republicans.
Regardless of political standing and views, it seems as if everyone is in
coherence with the notion expressed by Senator John McCain, “Washington is
broken”(qtd. in Zogby 47). However, it does not seem as if anyone is really
ready to do anything drastic to change this. In an article titled “The
President Would Rather Give Speeches About Our Problems than Resolve Them” by
Mitch McConnell, the senior U.S. Republican Senator from Kentucky, we can learn
about this exact issue. He explains how President Obama has been reluctant to
make any fundamental changes over the past six months. He discusses the
government spending of the money that we do not have, and how any tax increases
will destroy the jobs we have left. He says, “This debate isn’t about President
Obama and House Republicans... it isn’t about Congress and the White House...
it’s about what’s standing between the American people and the future we seek
for ourselves and our families” (McConnell 1).
Thinking of how politics affect our economy and the reverse, we have to
understand that the people who hold the positions of power decide what to do
with the money that we earn, and in turn we are required to pay a portion back
to them. Zuckerman also wrote an editorial entitled, “Money In Politics: A
Problem with No Easy Solutions.” Although he focuses mainly on the election of
2010 and the out-of-control campaign spending, he links this to and discusses
the entire overarching concept of wasteful political spending. He talks about
the money being wasted on advocacy for positions that these candidates likely
have no control over, or maybe do not care as much about as we think they do. He
questions our system for political financing. He says, “Our form of political
financing probably goes under the heading of the evil of two lessers, but
nobody has yet come up with a better solution” (Zuckerman1).
Whether it is liberal-biased media, conservative-biased media, an
interview with a senator, or a seemingly unbiased solution to the problem, all
of these things seem to have one thing in common: the fact that the country and
the government are no longer in agreement and not much is being done to change
the way the system is run. Although we may think that this turmoil is most
prevalent in our country, countries all over the globe are suffering from this
decline in governmental structure and efficiency. Thinking of the notion of how
and why American politics have changed, especially so quickly and recently,
should make us, as Americans, anxious and suspicious for the generations to
come. We have to take into account our foreign allies, our military, and our
economy, particularly because we have so many other countries invested in these
things.
An author named Mortimer B. Zuckerman wrote an editorial
in 2011 entitled, “The Bickering and Brinkmanship Must
Stop." He believes that if both the Democrats and Republicans could stop
arguing over petty things and get back to the way bipartisanship used to be,
based on compromise and give and take from both sides, then we would be in a
better place as a country. In regard to Zuckerman’s political standing, the New York Times states that, “Though not
currently enrolled in a party, he is known as a Democrat. But if he ran for the
Senate, it would very likely be as a Republican or independent so he could
avoid a costly primary. He gives his concerns about the way our government is
operating, and how there just does not seem to be enough middle ground” (Arango
and Barbaro). Although Zuckerman has been a supporter of the Democratic Party
for a long time, he has been critical of Obama and his choices, although he did
cast a vote for him in the 2008 election. He asks this question: Remember when Congress
saved Social Security, reformed the tax code, rationalized
immigration policy, and closed hundreds of military bases in the 1980s
and 1990s? Now we seem to lack the core group of moderates who used to negotiate
congressional compromises. They made our political system of checks and
balances work in the national interest. That seems to have unraveled. Republicans
moved to the right and Democrats to the left, while the political center is getting
weaker and thinner. (Zuckerman 1).
Although
people believe that the two parties are opposite from one another, they are
more alike than we all may know. Although voters have the ease of only having
to choose between two parties, it is limiting and can narrow people’s
perception. They are the same in the regard that they limit our options as
voters. This bipartisan system could continue to make people feel as if they
have fewer options.
Considering how people
believe that the political parties are rapidly growing further and further
apart, the idea of being part of a third party or being registered as an
Independent can seem outlandish at times. Somehow we are all expected to follow
political suit, although our political views may not all line up perfectly with
the two dominant parties. People may be suspicious of Third Parties. We do have
this unwritten, unofficial precedent that people are expected to follow. This
makes a difference in our media, our economy, our education systems, and it
puts us well on our way to extremism on both sides.
It actually seems as if there has been clear dissatisfaction with the
lack of change in the American government for over a hundred years, although
people are unwilling to make changes.
Henry George, an American writer, political economist and politician, wrote and
published a piece in 1881 called Political
Dangers which was included in Chapter two of his book Social Problems.
He says, “The popular idea of reform seems to be merely a change of men or a
change of parties, not a change of system…Our two great political parties have
really nothing more to propose than the keeping or the taking of the offices
from the other party” (George).
John Zogby reports that politicians lack
integrity and tend to operate selfishly to advance their own careers and finances.
He also discusses the problem with Washington stems from “the idea that the
vast majority of politicians belong to a privileged caste, conspiring together (and
often with other elites, such as media, academics and businesses) to pass laws
that serve them, rather than the people.” Ironically, the politicians are
critical of themselves, which they do for some ulterior motive related to
self-interest.
This is not a sustainable political
system. America has gotten to the point where the duality of our governmental
system has infected the minds of the majority of our citizens. We are
constantly being pushed and pulled to either side. There is a notable pressing
necessity of “choosing a side”, and the animosity between citizens that stems
from our own political, personal views. When your personal and political views
do not clearly line up with either of the candidates, you are forced to make a
choice between the two, or register as an Independent.
It is so common that personal animosity
between citizens in this country stems from differences in political views.
Politics and your views on the matter are some of the easiest things to get
into an argument about, especially with someone who is supportive of the
opposing party. When we rely on our government for everything, and they fail us
over and over, how are we as a country supposed to act when we feel as if we
are no longer being helped, but harmed?
Works
Cited
Tim
Arango, Michael Barbaro, and. "Zuckerman Is Said to Be Weighing Bid for Senate."
George,
Henry. "Chapter 2-Political Dangers." Social Problems. London: K.
Paul, Trench and, 1881. N. pag.
Print.
McConnell,
Mitch. "The President Would Rather Give Speeches About Our Problems Than Resolve Them." Vital Speeches Of The Day 77.9 (2011):
305-306. Academic Search Premier.
Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
N.Y./Region.
The New York Times, 12 Feb. 2010. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
Zogby,
John. "The Bipartisan Problem." Politics (Campaigns & Elections)
31.4 (2010): 47. Academic Search
Premier. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Zuckerman,
Mortimer B. "The Bickering and Brinkmanship Must Stop." U.S. News
Digital Weekly 12 Aug. 2011: 27.
Academic Search Premier. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Zuckerman,
Mortimer B. "Money in Politics: A Problem With No Easy Solutions."
U.S. News Digital Weekly 06
Apr. 2012: 21. Academic Search Premier. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment